The Secrets of Brutalism: An analysis of concrete and functionality
Introduction Brutalism, an architectural style that emerged in the post-war period, is often associated with the austerity of its forms and the predominant use of exposed concrete.
However, brutalism goes far beyond a mere aesthetic choice. It represents a design philosophy that values functionality, the honesty of materials and a direct relationship with social needs. This article explores the secrets behind brutalism, its history, characteristics, cultural impact and iconic examples from around the world.
History and Origins of Brutalism
The term “brutalism” derives from the French expression béton brut, which means “raw concrete”. It was popularized by Le Corbusier, one of the greatest names in modern architecture. However, the brutalist movement gained momentum in the 1950s in the UK, with architects such as Peter and Alison Smithson leading projects that sought to meet the needs of post-war reconstruction.
Key Historical Elements:
- Post-war reconstruction: Many brutalist buildings were designed for low-income housing and public buildings.
- Inspiration from Modernism: Modernism’s functionalist ideals directly influenced the style.
- Rejection of Ornament: Brutalism contrasts with the decorative architecture of the past, emphasizing simple forms and raw materials.
Main characteristics of Brutalism
- Use of exposed concrete: Concrete is often left exposed, enhancing its natural texture.
Geometric Shapes and Modular Repetition: Brutalist buildings have solid lines and repetitive structures that convey order and rigidity.
Functionality over Form: Projects prioritize the usefulness of spaces, reflecting a practical and accessible approach.
Simple and Practical Interiors: Focus on well-planned interior spaces that are optimized for use.
Iconic Examples of Brutalist Architecture
- SESC Pompéia (São Paulo, Brazil): Designed by Lina Bo Bardi, SESC combines brutalism with a welcoming and human design. The creative use of concrete transforms functional spaces into aesthetic experiences.
- Barbican Centre (Londres, Reino Unido): A multifunctional complex comprising residences, cultural and commercial spaces, it represents the essence of brutalism.
- Habitat 67 (Montreal, Canadá): Designed by Moshe Safdie, this residential complex is a reinterpretation of brutalism, standing out for its modularity and integration with the environment.
Comparison table:
| Edifício | Localização | Características |
| SESC Pompéia | São Paulo, Brazil | Cultural and social spaces |
| Barbican Centre | London, United Kingdom | Multifunctional complex |
| Habitat 67 | Montreal, Canada | Modularity and innovative design |
Social and Cultural Impact
Brutalism was widely adopted for housing projects and institutional buildings in the 20th century. However, its aesthetic polarized opinions:
- Positive aspects:
Accessible functionality.
Art-related events
Increased use of art
Reduced construction costs.
Strength and durability of materials.
Criticisms:
“Cold” and “impersonal” appearance.
Association with decaying public spaces in some regions.Relevant Quotes: “Architecture should be designed for everyone, not just to please the eye.” – Peter Smithson
+ The Role of Oscar Niemeyer and Burle Marx in Brazilian Architecture
Brutalism in Brazil
Brazilian brutalism is a unique branch of the global movement, adapted to the country’s cultural and climatic specificities. Characterized by the use of exposed concrete and an emphasis on functionality, the style found expression in iconic works such as Lina Bo Bardi’s MASP and SESC Pompéia, which not only redefined the concept of public architecture, but also created accessible and inclusive spaces for the community. Architects such as Vilanova Artigas incorporated social and political values into their creations, consolidating brutalism as a response to Brazil’s urban and social demands.
More than a style, Brazilian brutalism is an architectural philosophy that unites form and purpose, exploiting the raw potential of materials to create impactful and durable structures. Despite the criticism that associates it with aesthetic coldness, it reflects a concern for functionalism, economy of resources and accessibility, values that remain relevant in contemporary architecture. To preserve these works is to preserve a vital chapter in Brazil’s architectural history, which continues to inspire new generations of professionals in search of an architecture committed to society.
Brazilian highlights:
MASP (São Paulo Museum of Art): The elevated structure and the use of concrete make this a landmark of Brutalism.
Copan Building: Although not exclusively brutalist, it reflects the influence of the movement in its functionality and bold design.
Contemporary Reinterpretation
Brutalism has been revisited by contemporary architects who value honest materials and functionality. Recent projects combine the style with sustainable solutions and modern technologies.
Current example:
Maggie’s Centre, Manchester (UK): Designed by Foster + Partners, this center combines concrete and natural elements to create a welcoming space.
Conclusion
The secrets of Brutalism lie in its ability to unite functionality and form in an honest and impactful way. Despite criticism, the movement continues to influence contemporary architecture and inspire debates about the role of architecture in society.
Brutalism also challenges our aesthetic perception by emphasizing beauty in simplicity and structural truth. It promotes reflection on the conscious use of resources, encouraging architects to exploit materials in a direct and effective way. In times of growing concern for sustainability, Brutalist ideals of efficiency and durability are gaining new relevance.
Brutalism also carries a symbolic value. It is often associated with periods of social transformation, serving as an architectural reminder of the collective aspirations of a society under reconstruction. It is a style that celebrates utilitarianism, but also invites dialogue about the interaction between architecture and community.
In the contemporary context, brutalist buildings are being rediscovered and preserved as part of cultural heritage. They represent an era of architectural daring and a commitment to functionalism that transcends fads. Brutalism inspires both admiration and controversy, and it is precisely this duality that makes it so fascinating.
Modern architects such as Tadao Ando and David Chipperfield have revisited brutalist elements, adapting them to meet the demands of the 21st century. This demonstrates that the style is not a relic of the past, but a continuous source of inspiration. Brutalism thus remains relevant, not just as an architectural style, but as a philosophy that challenges paradigms and promotes authentic and inclusive architecture.
Ultimately, brutalism teaches us to value the essence of materials and the intrinsic beauty of functionality. It reminds us that architecture, before being a form of artistic expression, is a response to human needs. It is an invitation to look beyond raw concrete and recognize the depth of its intention.
Read More:
